WHEN YOU CANNOT PROVE CONTROL, YOU LOSE TIME, TRUST, DEALS
We build business resilience:
clear owners, faster decisions, current evidence
TRUSTED BY:
The Real Cost: Business Disruption
Organisations struggle because decisions are implicit, ownership is unclear across functions, and evidence is scattered. This creates recurring disruption when procurement, customers, the board, or regulators need answers.
- Deals slow down because customer assurance becomes repetitive and inconsistent
- Certifications become commercial gates, but the evidence trail is unclear
- Audit and assessment become fire drills with re-works and emergency spending
- Incidents and near misses create disruption
- Leaders cannot make risk trade-offs confidently
- Coordination failures between security, privacy, compliance, and the business create avoidable issues and churn risk
We help organisations under regulatory pressure turn security and governance into clear ownership, faster decisions, and credible evidence on demand, through an executive partnership backed by a live cockpit.
Negative impact of business disruption
The costs are measurable, but the root cause is structural: fragmented evidence, unclear decision rights, and too many handoffs. Boards need a single view of risk, ownership, and progress instead of another spreadsheet or static report.
Financial impact
- Fines and penalties
- Lost revenue and missed deals
- Cyber incident costs
Operational impact
- Project delays and disruption
- Firefighting and last-minute scrambles
- Re-work and duplicated audits
Strategic impact
- Missed opportunities
- Lost momentum
- Governance friction
- Slowed decision making
Reputational impact
- Trust erosion: customers and partners
- Public scrutiny
- Brand damage
By addressing the root causes, we help organisations
avoid the huge risks and optimise the costs.
Why common approaches fail
Traditional approaches to GRC break down under modern conditions.
They create artefacts instead of a runable operating system.
- Spreadsheets and siloed tools scatter evidence and ownership
- One-off consulting produces documentation that decays between scrutiny moments
- Heavy GRC tooling becomes form work, so teams avoid it and leaders stop trusting reporting
- Policies diverge from operating reality, so compliance becomes parallel bureaucracy
What we do differently at Flodisq
If you don’t know what you’re protecting, then you can’t protect it.
Flodisq is a governance operating system. Partner led execution plus a cockpit that keeps decisions, ownership, and evidence current.
We make decisions explicit, assign ownership, run a cadence, and keep evidence current through a single cockpit that captures what is agreed and what is done.
- Executive partnership from day one
- Continuous executive cockpit capturing decisions, actions, and evidence as work happens
- Orchestration across specialists and point tools: curate trusted options with clear scope, owners, and evidence handoffs captured in the cockpit
We make governance operational and continuous.
What you get
- REDUCE DOWNSIDE:
fines, incidents, failed audits - CUT WASTED EFFORT:
misalignment and rework - ACCELERATE COMMERCIAL OUTCOMES:
sales velocity, smoother operations, stronger trust
START WITH A BASELINE CALL
If security and governance are creating recurring disruption, blocked revenue, or board risk, we start with a short baseline call and give you a clear recommendation on what matters, what to do first, and how to keep it current.
Who we are
Boutique, senior, and direct.
We work as your business partners.
We surface where governance breaks in operating reality, then make it runable through clear ownership, decision discipline, and evidence that stays current.
BAS VOLKERS
Cybersecurity and governance leadership, responsible for overall security programme direction and risk posture.
MARINA LUKYANOVA
Strategy alignment and operating model, responsible for decision rights, cross-functional alignment, and cadence.
We work as your business partners.
We surface where governance breaks in operating reality, then make it runable through clear ownership, decision discipline, and evidence that stays current.
BAS VOLKERS
Cybersecurity and governance leadership, responsible for overall security programme direction and risk posture.
MARINA LUKYANOVA
Strategy alignment and operating model, responsible for decision rights, cross-functional alignment, and cadence.
HANS STENFERT KROESE
Privacy and partner solutions, responsible for privacy governance and assurance readiness.
Privacy and partner solutions, responsible for privacy governance and assurance readiness.
Get your business resilient
through clear ownership, faster decision cycles, and less disruption
InfoSec story
Learn how information security really works, delivered to your inbox every other week